Case study

Entry-luxury apartment towers: launch windows that made leads up to 7x cheaper

23,011 leads at PKR 787 — the project’s cost per lead fell once the budget followed the launch calendar instead of an even monthly split.

The challenge

This was the volume engine of the portfolio — the most accessible apartment product, and the largest spender. Its always-on prospecting ad set was spending PKR 3.65M and returning leads at PKR 1,845, while launch-window ad sets in the same project returned leads at PKR 243 to PKR 602.

What the numbers said

Ad setLeadsCost per leadCTR
Interest + geo, launch window629PKR 2430.86%
Pre-launch, interest audience780PKR 4570.70%
Pre-launch, broad3,871PKR 5010.65%
Grand launch, interest986PKR 5060.91%
Grand launch, broad1,464PKR 6020.81%
Demographic audience1,419PKR 6510.61%
Always-on prospecting1,984PKR 1,8450.58%
Project total (21 ad sets)23,011PKR 7870.63%

Sorted by cost per lead, the ad sets lined up almost perfectly by their distance from an event. The always-on set was not badly built; it simply gave nobody a reason to act this week instead of next month.

What we changed

  • Rebuilt the calendar around three phases: pre-launch build-up, a concentrated window around each ceremony, and post-launch consolidation.
  • Lifted daily budget during the unveiling window, then stepped it back down as the window closed.
  • Reduced always-on prospecting to a maintenance floor whose job is to keep retargeting pools full between events.
  • Added Google Search on top of Meta to catch the branded searches the launch was creating.

Budget should follow the calendar, not the spreadsheet. An even monthly split overpays in quiet weeks and underspends in the exact windows where leads are cheapest.

Start a project

Want results like these?

Tell us about your business. You will get a clear plan and a transparent quote within one business day.

See our results